Moody’s: Weak Capital Buffers Reveal Tier 2 Banks’ Vulnerability
- Nigerian businesses lose $25bn annually to power outages
One of the leading global rating
agencies, Moody’s Investor Service, yesterday pointed out that the
smaller banks in Nigeria, commonly known as the tier 2 banks, are
operating with weaker capital buffers, which indicate vulnerability of
these banks.
This is coming as World Bank Group (WBG) report has disclosed that Nigerian businesses experience an average of 239 hours power outages monthly, compelling them to resort to alternative electricity sources, which in turn results in economic losses in excess of $25 billion annually.
The rating agency, however, noted that capital buffers are strong for the bigger banks in the country.
Moody’s stated this in a 35-page report on its 2019 outlook for African banks.
Moody’s stated this in a 35-page report on its 2019 outlook for African banks.
The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN)
requires that banks with international subsidiaries maintain a capital
adequacy ratio (CAR) of 15 per cent, while banks without international
subsidiaries maintain CAR of 10 per cent.
But the minimum requirement for the systemically important banks is 16 per cent.
But the minimum requirement for the systemically important banks is 16 per cent.
The apex bank had in its recently
released half year economic report, revealed that as of June 2018, three
commercial banks did not have the prescribed minimum liquidity ratio of
30 per cent.
The CBN had also warned commercial banks
to guard against emerging risks in the financial system, saying the
sector’s resilience was receding.
The Deputy Governor, Corporate Service
Department of the bank, Mr. Edward Adamu, had stated this in a statement
at the September 2018 Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting.
He had also noted the rising
non-performing loans (NPLs) ratio in the sector, which he said was
driven essentially by oil sector exposures. Equally of concern to Adamu
was the decline in capital market indicators.
Continuing, Moody’s in the report noted
that the risks to the operating environment relate to the rising US
interest rates leading to capital outflows across emerging markets, in
conjunction with rising government debt and currency depreciation, could
significantly harm African banks’ loan quality and access to foreign
currency.
The report, however, stated that Nigeria
has a stable outlook because of the improved foreign-currency liquidity
and rising loan quality.
Furthermore, it explained that higher
oil prices and partial liberalisation of the foreign-exchange market
have eased pressures on, “unhedged borrowers and normalised
foreign-currency liquidity.”
It, however, pointed out that asset
risks nonetheless remain high as Nigerian banks continue to tackle
legacy issues, “similarly, earnings remain under pressure as loss-loss
provisions remain elevated.”
For banks in the continent generally, the report predicted that the financial institutions would show financial resilience.
It projected a mild recovery in economic
growth, driven by relatively stable commodity prices, robust domestic
demand and domestic policy adjustments.
It stated, “Stricter regulation and
better supervision will also help address legacy governance issues and
support banks’ financial stability. We view Egyptian, Moroccan and
Mauritius rated banks as most resilient.
“Banks’ credit profiles remain sensitive
to such developments, including through inter-linkages with their
sovereigns, particularly given their large holdings of government
securities.
“Many sovereigns came out of the recent
commodity slump with weakened fiscal positions. Tunisian, Tanzanian and
DRC banks are most at risk, and to a lesser extent South African,
Nigerian and Angolan banks.
“For 2019, we expect most rated banks to
maintain stable profitability, build up their capital buffers and
retain ample local currency funding.
“Asset risks will remain high, while we
also expect some renewed tightening of foreign currency liquidity; banks
are, however, in a better position to withstand pressures following
efforts to reduce foreign-currency lending.”
For Moody’s rated countries, the report
projected Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth of 3.8 per cent in 2019,
up from 3.1 per cent in 2018 and 2.7 per cent in 2017, stating that
growth would be driven by relatively stable oil and commodity prices,
stronger agricultural output, domestic policy adjustments and strong
domestic demand.
It added, “For the continent’s two
biggest economies -Nigeria and South Africa, growth will be more subdued
at 2.3 per cent and 1.3 per cent respectively, but higher than
2016-2018.
“More stable oil prices will drive
economic acceleration in Nigeria and improved business and investor
confidence will spur improvement in South Africa.
“The new macro-prudential limits set in
Egypt; implementation of Basel II/III capital standards in the West
African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU) and the adoption of IFRS 9
accounting standards across most African countries.
“These initiatives will also help
address legacy corporate governance issues and patchy credit
underwriting that were behind the recent failure of banks in Angola and
of second-tier banks in Kenya, Tanzania and Nigeria.
“In this environment we project a slight acceleration in loan growth to around 10 per cent.”
It also stated that political
uncertainty and risk of social unrest are an ever-present challenge for
Africa, citing South Africa, Tanzania, and Nigeria as some of the
countries that face such challenges, which could weaken investor and
consumer confidence.
“External shocks such as falling
commodity prices, drought, or an escalation of global trade wars, could
hurt African corporate and their ability to repay debt,” it warned.
Nigerian Businesses Lose $25bn Annually to Power Outage
Meanwhile, a World Bank Group (WBG)
report has disclosed that Nigerian businesses experience an average of
239 hours power outages monthly, compelling them to resort to
alternative electricity sources, which in turn results in economic
losses in excess of $25 billion annually.
The document, obtained by THISDAY was
part of the Power Sector Recovery Programme (PSRP), which the World Bank
developed in 2017 with the federal government to revive Nigeria’s
ailing power sector privatised in 2013.
It explained that poor electricity supply in the country also leads to payment apathy by consumers.
According to the report, with the high
power outages, Nigerian firms frequently resort to alternative
electricity sources which in turn results to economic losses in excess
of $25 billion annually.
Titled, ‘Program-for-Results Information
Document (PID) – concept stage’ under the Power Sector Recovery
Performance Based Loan, the report stated: “Electricity service delivery
is poor with serious repercussions for Nigerian economy and citizens.
“Average annual per capita electricity
consumption of Nigeria (147 kWh) is a fifth of the average low
middle-income country consumption (736 kWh) and a twentieth of the
global average consumption (3,298 kWh).
“The unreliable power supply results in
lack of consumers’ willingness to pay, drives industry to pursue
off-grid alternatives and causes economic losses in excess of US$25
billion annually (the PSRP estimate),” it said.
It further explained: “Nigerian
businesses experience an average of 239 hours of power outages per
month, accounting for nearly seven per cent of lost sales. Most private
enterprises are forced to resort to self-generation at a high cost to
themselves and the economy (about US$0.20 – 0.30 per kWh as compared to
the current grid based tariff of US$0.16 per kWh).”
The report equally noted that an
investment climate assessment conducted in Nigeria indicated that a good
number of Nigerian business owners considered lack of electricity as
being the biggest obstacle to doing business in the country.
According to it, the steep decline in
power output in 2016 from the peak of over 5,000 megawatts (MW) in March
2016 to less than 3,500MW in early 2017 contributed to the contraction
of economic activity by an estimated 1.5 per cent in 2016.
The document also stated that the lack
of consistently cost-reflective tariffs and low collections have been
the main sources of the poor financial viability of electricity
distribution companies (Discos), which it noted, have accumulated huge
revenue deficits in the market.
It said, “From November 2013 to December
2014, the accumulated financial deficit was NGN213 billion (US$678
million, equivalent). An additional deficit of about NGN473 billion
(US$1.5 billion, equivalent) was accumulated from January 2015 to
December 2016.
“End-user tariffs have fallen below cost
recovery due to their inadequate adjustment for inflation, exchange
rate, and actual amount of energy delivered.”

Comments